(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a(a(x1)) → b(x1)
a(b(c(x1))) → c(c(a(a(a(a(x1))))))

Q is empty.

(1) NonTerminationProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We used the non-termination processor [OPPELT08] to show that the SRS problem is infinite.

Found the self-embedding DerivationStructure:
a b c b c c a c cc c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a c c a a a a

a b c b c c a c cc c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a c c a a a a
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b c b c c a cc c c c a c c b c c a a b c b c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b c b c c ac c c c a c c b c c a a b c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c b c c ac c c c a c c b c c a a a a c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c b c c ac c c c a c c b a b c c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b c b c cc c c c a c c b a b c c b a a
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b c b cc c c c a c c b a b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c b cc c c c a a b c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c b cc c c c a a a a c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c b cc c a b c c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b cc c a b a
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b c ac c b a b
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b c ac c a a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c b a a
by OverlapClosure OC 3
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c a a b
by OverlapClosure OC 2
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)
a ab
by original rule (OC 1)
a b cc c a a a a
by original rule (OC 1)

(2) NO